Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Liberec

IČO 00262978

Good buyer. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

10.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Integra stavby a.s.
3 35,344,954
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 25,985,600
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
2 25,008,992
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
3 20,406,950
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 19,602,951
Other suppliers 45 159,013,189

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 55% (11 from 20)
Nonprice competition 25% (5 from 20)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 20)
E-auction 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

35%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 547,491,740
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 3,848,128,120
Total 4,395,619,860

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zpracování dokumentace nového návrhu územního plánu Liberec
Additional works
- 2,450,000
Nákup tepelné energie pro objekty SML včetně objektů, které využívají příspěvkové organizace a společnosti města
Technical exclusivity , Authorship rights
- Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

82%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 15%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 61)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 61)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 61)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 61)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 61)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 61)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 61)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 61)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 61)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 57 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders