Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Dobříš

IČO 00242098

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
1. Základní škola Dobříš - stavební úpravy, nástavba a přístavba - šatny, varna, učebny
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace Sběrného dvoru Dobříš
Kontejnery a nádoby na odpad a odpadky
1
Ø2 in industry
Úpravy místní komunikacev ul. Fričova - Dobříš
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení budovy městské polikliniky v Dobříši
Rekonstrukce budov
3
Ø4 in industry
Konsolidace IT města Dobříše - část I
Místní sítě
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POHL cz, a.s.
1 17,718,296
TREPART s.r.o.
1 17,718,296
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s.
1 8,378,097
STRABAG a.s.
1 6,281,241
INVESSALES, spol. s r.o.
1 5,110,744
Other suppliers 5 3,995,968

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 79,605,346
Unregulated purchases 379,239,782
Total 458,845,128

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
1,136,904

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

45%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (1 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 10% (1 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)