Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Přeštice

IČO 00257125

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mavilla s.r.o.
2 20,184,836
TAURON Czech Energy s.r.o.
1 12,274,932
SILNICE CHMELÍŘ s.r.o.
2 7,089,561
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 3,876,047
Joes garage brewery, s.r.o.
1 3,679,500
Other suppliers 4 8,254,033

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

45%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 81,143,181
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 327,901,381
Total 409,044,562

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce ulice Komenského - dodatečné stavební práce I.
Additional works
- 625,467

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 33% (3 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 11% (1 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 11% (1 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders