City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 20

IČO 00240192

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

1.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 42%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EMV s.r.o.
1 13,440,000
STRABAG a.s.
1 12,997,458
ORSmix s.r.o.
1 8,631,141
YOUR SYSTEM, spol. s r.o.
1 6,788,200
LANGERONE, SE
3 4,563,544
Other suppliers 3 5,441,028

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

58%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 17% (1 from 6)
Nonprice competition 17% (1 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zateplení a výměna oken MŠ Ratibořická 2299, 2. etapa - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works , Outside directive scope
86,734
Zateplení Domu dětí a mládeže Horní Počernice - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works , Outside directive scope
42,291

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

98%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.10 (average mistakes per contract)