Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Rumburk

IČO 00261602

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

27.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování varovného a výstražného systému ochrany před povodněmi pro město Rumburk
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce technologie chlazení zimního stadionu Rumburk
Instalace a montáž větrání a klimatizace
3
Ø3 in industry
Zimní údržba místních komunikací města Rumburk
Čistící a hygienické služby v městských a venkovských oblastech a související služby
2
Ø2 in industry
Generální oprava vozidla Tatra CAS 32 T 815 pro SDH Rumburk
Přebudování a generální opravy vozidel
3
Ø2 in industry
Konsolidace IT Rumburk
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EKKL a.s.
1 20,801,318
TELMO a.s.
1 9,447,958
ENERGO CHOCEŇ, s.r.o.
1 6,977,000
ZEPS s.r.o.
1 5,400,000
ANZA s.r.o.
1 2,895,361
Other suppliers 3 4,410,410

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Inovativni 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 103,291,857
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 392,937,983
Total 496,229,840

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (1 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 8)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

81%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.25 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu 8 zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek