Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Rumburk

IČO 00261602

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Vybudování varovného a výstražného systému ochrany před povodněmi pro město Rumburk
Flood-prevention works
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce technologie chlazení zimního stadionu Rumburk
Ventilation and air-conditioning installation work
Ø3 in industry
Zimní údržba místních komunikací města Rumburk
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
Ø2 in industry
Generální oprava vozidla Tatra CAS 32 T 815 pro SDH Rumburk
Vehicle conversion and reconditioning services
Ø2 in industry
Konsolidace IT Rumburk
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EKKL a.s.
1 20,801,318
TELMO a.s.
1 9,447,958
1 6,977,000
ZEPS s.r.o.
1 5,400,000
ANZA s.r.o.
1 2,895,361
Other suppliers 3 4,410,410

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 103,291,857
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 392,937,983
Total 496,229,840

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (1 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.25 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders