City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 18

IČO 00231321

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

12%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přístavba ZŠ Tupolevova - vytvoření nových tříd
Construction work
2
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti víceúčelového objektu Třinecká 650, Praha

5
Ø5 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor v objektu ZŠ Fryčovická, Praha

5
Ø5 in industry
Odborná péče o zeleň - Praha 18
Planting and maintenance services of green areas
3
Ø4 in industry
Z 410 - Dodání zásahového požárního automobilu CAS 30 - II
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

30%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Trigema Building a.s.
1 97,849,469
NEPRO stavební a.s.
4 31,274,529
Michal Bohumel IRONEX
1 6,998,059
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,665,000
IPPOS BOHEMIA s.r.o.
1 6,205,266
Other suppliers 5 4,871,482

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 14% (1 from 7)
Nonprice competition 29% (2 from 7)
Division into lots 14% (1 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Snížení energetické náročnosti víceúčelového objektu Třinecká 650, Praha – vícepráce
Additional works
- 2,565,140
Realizace energetických úspor v objektu ZŠ Fryčovická, Praha – vícepráce
Additional works
- 2,257,909

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 2.14

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (1 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 9% (1 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders