Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Lipník nad Bečvou

IČO 00301493

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba sportovní haly, Lipník nad Bečvou

6
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE ULICE NA KOPEČKU, LIPNÍK NAD BEČVOU
Construction work
12
Ø5 in industry
Křižovatku u sokolovny, Lipník nad Bečvou
Construction work
6
Ø5 in industry
Odstranění objektu k bydlení č.p. 658, ulice Nádražní, Lipník nad Bečvou
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
13
Ø8 in industry
REGENERACE ZELENĚ NA SÍDLIŠTI DUKLA
Planting and maintenance services of green areas
9
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

8%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební společnost NAVRÁTIL, s.r.o.
1 68,991,712
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o., odštěpný závod Dopravní stavby MORAVA
1 6,478,821
ARES Lipník n.B., s.r.o.
2 5,047,634
L.N.O., s.r.o.
1 1,701,912

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 126,904,847
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 195,800,560
Total 322,705,407

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

44%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 43% (3 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.40 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 5 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders