Government • 2019 • past ranking

Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy

IČO 00022985

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

14.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Konference II 2017
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
25
Ø1 in industry
Konference 2018
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
9
Ø1 in industry
Mediální kampaň OP VVV - Mediální kampaň OP VVV - Část 1) Televize
Rekreační, kulturní a sportovní služby
9
Ø2 in industry
Organizační a technické zajištění jednání Řídicího orgánu OP VVV
Organizace výstav, veletrhů a kongresů
4
Ø3 in industry
Zajišťování kurzů češtiny pro osoby s udělenou mezinárodní ochranou na období 2016 – 2018
Vzdělávání a školení
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
3 136,407,392
UNNI Trading, s.r.o.
11 71,757,371
McCANN-ERICKSON PRAGUE spol. s r.o., INTERNATIONAL ADVERTISING AGENCY
4 43,754,600
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
1 43,159,222
Moudrý překlad, s.r.o.
13 41,425,000
Other suppliers 156 491,242,830

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

56%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 14% (5 from 37)
Nonprice competition 38% (15 from 39)
Division into lots 31% (12 from 39)
E-auction 3% (1 from 39)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 39)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

92%
average 75%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 654,971,590
Small scale tenders 231,178,196
Unregulated purchases 166,173,218
Total 1,052,323,004

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 75%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
MŠMT - Rekonstrukce nádvoří areálu Karmelitská - realizace stavebních prací
Outside directive scope
- 9,196,384
Úklidové a čistící práce pro MŠMT
Emergency
- 3,685,000
Poskytování servisní a materiálové podpory k multifunkčním a tiskovým zařízením, včetně dodávky spotřebního materiálu k tiskárnám
Outside directive scope
- 3,493,875
Zajištění pronájmu licencí a související služby MS na rok 2017
Outside directive scope
- 2,194,641

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 35%
Average requirements modifications count 0.41
Average decision length 108.23 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (2 from 57)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (12 from 57)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 57)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 57)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 57)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 57)
Missing call for tenders 9% (5 from 57)
Missing winning price 2% (1 from 57)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 57)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.89 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 54 tenders under the law)
0-250K 15 tenders
250K-500K 9 tenders
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 25 tenders