Government • 2019 • past ranking

Agentura pro podporu podnikání a investic Czechinvest

IČO 71377999

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění služeb agentury práce při poskytování dočasně přidělených zaměstnanců
Zpracování fotografií
2
Ø3 in industry
Poskytování specializovaných poradenských služeb pro MSP - Marketing a PR
Podnikatelské a manažerské poradenství a související služby
3
Ø3 in industry
Poskytování specializovaných poradenských služeb pro MSP - Právní poradenství v oblasti duševního vlastnictví
Právní služby
3
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka kancelářského nábytku a židlí pro resort MPO
Nábytek
2
Ø3 in industry
Rámcová smlouva na nákup notebooků a tabletů - Tablety
Osobní počítače
0
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BDO Advisory s.r.o.
4 60,350,414
Havel, Holásek & Partners s.r.o., advokátní kancelář
1 20,090,909
Mega Trans – výrobní družstvo invalidů
1 19,615,000
FreeDivision s.r.o.
2 17,743,128
JŠK, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
1 14,856,196
Other suppliers 23 53,040,292

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

60%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (9 from 18)
Nonprice competition 50% (9 from 18)
Division into lots 39% (7 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 75%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 345,583,523
Small scale tenders 5,888,060
Unregulated purchases 463,115,055
Total 814,586,638

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 11%
Average requirements modifications count 0.61
Average decision length 95.80 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Final or estimated price not published 26% (7 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 4% (1 from 27)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 27)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

29%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.87 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 4 tenders