Government • 2019 • past ranking

Správa úložišť radioaktivních odpadů

IČO 66000769

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Court found serious misconduct.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výzkumná podpora pro bezpečnostní hodnocení hlubinného úložiště
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry
Výzkumná podpora pro bezpečnostní hodnocení hlubinného úložiště
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry
Převod budovy Na Florenci 7-9
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry
Výzkumná podpora pro projektové řešení hlubinného úložiště
Architektonické, technické a plánovací služby
2
Ø2 in industry
Výzkumná podpora pro projektové řešení hlubinného úložiště
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DIAMO, státní podnik
4 526,600,000
ÚJV Řež, a.s.
9 352,497,383
České vysoké učení technické v Praze
7 172,226,208
INSET s.r.o.
7 86,223,662
Posiva Oy lead party in consortium with Saanio & Riekkola Oy
1 74,310,500
Other suppliers 64 424,046,016

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 28% (5 from 18)
Nonprice competition 52% (11 from 21)
Division into lots 14% (3 from 21)
E-auction 0% (0 from 21)
Innovative procedure 10% (2 from 21)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 75%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

18%
average 75%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zajištění provozuschopnosti a běžné údržby PVP Bukov
Technical exclusivity
- 259,000,000
Prodloužení provozování experimentu EPSP
Technical exclusivity
- 3,673,006
DLOUHODOBÉ MONITOROVÁNÍ HORNINOVÉHO MASIVU V PVP BUKOV NEDESTRUKTIVNÍMI GEOFYZIKÁLNÍMI METODAMI
Technical exclusivity
- 3,650,000
Využití zkušeností ze švýcarské podzemní laboratoře Grimsel při experimentech v PVP Bukov
Technical exclusivity
- 3,464,876

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

39%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 26%
Average requirements modifications count 1.26
Average decision length 113.28 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (5 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 29)
Missing winning price 3% (1 from 29)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 84% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.84 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 25 tenders under the law)
0-250K 3 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 17 tenders
1000K+ 55 tenders