Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Litvínov

IČO 00266027

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kulturní dům Citadela - realizace úspor energie (zateplení)
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
13
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikací a VO v ul. Tylova v Litvínově
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø7 in industry
Komplexní revitalizace veřejných prostor v sídlišti Janov - IV
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø7 in industry
Komplexní revitalizace veřejných prostor v sídlišti Janov – VI
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací okrsek Vilová, Litvínov
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
KP servis Most s.r.o.
9 45,588,019
HERKUL a.s.
6 33,180,855
EUROMONT GROUP a.s.
5 20,190,133
Stavební společnost Jaroslav Oršuliak, a.s.
7 15,655,401
Severočeská teplárenská, a. s.
1 10,500,000
Other suppliers 41 65,929,060

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 35% (6 from 17)
Nonprice competition 29% (5 from 17)
Lots 12% (2 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 419,761,276
Unregulated purchases 618,167,299
Total 1,037,928,575

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

26%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

87%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (7 from 61)
Final or estimated price not published 7% (4 from 61)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 61)
Missing supplier ID 5% (3 from 61)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 61)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 61)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 61)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 61)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

26%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 49% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.92 (average mistakes per contract)