Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Jirkov

IČO 00261904

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

34.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce ul. Dvořákova v Jirkově, včetně zhotovení okružních křižovatek
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø7 in industry
Zasíťování lokality pro RD Na Skalce, Jirkov
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
21
Ø6 in industry
IPRM - Revitalizace sídliště, lokalita Studentská ul.
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul.Studentská v Jirkově
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø7 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor v objektech města Jirkova (3. ZŠ, Nerudova čp. 1151 a 1152, Městský ústav sociálních služeb, U Dubu 1562)
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HERKUL a.s.
1 34,501,714
Vodohospodářská stavební spol. s r. o.
1 15,483,267
Skanska a.s.
3 14,527,842
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 12,108,073
Intermont, Opatrný, s.r.o.
2 11,626,318
Other suppliers 15 45,558,474

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 267,937,271
Unregulated purchases 717,899,102
Total 985,836,372

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)