Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Čáslav

IČO 00236021

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zastřešení ledové plochy včetně dostavby zázemí v Čáslavi
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
8
Ø5 in industry
Stavba nekryté ledové plochy
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
4
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy hotelu Grand v Čáslavi
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy společenského sálu Grand
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce hotelu Grand - ubytovací část
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Realitní a stavební společnost s.r.o.
8 76,724,499
Bytostav Poruba a. s.
3 60,449,275
SYNER, s.r.o.
5 40,408,249
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 7,142,780
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
4 6,218,064
Other suppliers 3 11,698,558

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

45%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 298,892,776
Unregulated purchases 304,090,233
Total 602,983,010

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

82%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 32% (7 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (3 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

14%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 41% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)