Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Trutnov

IČO 00278360

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

19.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a dostavba Střediska volného času Trutnov
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Horská, Trutnov – Horní Staré Město
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Mládežnická - pavilon B2, C, D, E
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
II/301 Trutnov, Poříčí, ul. Petříkovická
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø7 in industry
Komplexní pojištění majetku města a odpovědnosti za škodu
Pojištění
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BAK stavební společnost, a.s.
3 173,696,437
M-SILNICE a.s.
5 31,409,171
STYLBAU, s.r.o.
2 22,174,043
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 16,697,411
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
2 10,377,721
Other suppliers 15 58,694,332

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 360,935,444
Unregulated purchases 845,497,109
Total 1,206,432,553

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 87%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 3% (1 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.37 (average mistakes per contract)