Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Jičín

IČO 00271632

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Court found serious misconduct.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Novostavba objektu centrálního provozního zázemí v Jičínském sportovním areálu
Construction work for sports facilities
11
Ø3 in industry
Novostavba objektu centrálního provozního zázemí v Jičínském sportovním areálu

11
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce biograf Český ráj, Jičín
Cinema construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Kolejové úpravy nákladového nádraží Jičín
Intercity railway works
3
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy č. p. 12 a 13 Základní školy a Praktické školy, Jičín
Construction work for school buildings
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
7 162,388,325
STAV-AGENCY s.r.o.
3 28,020,337
MIRAS - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
4 24,789,744
M-SILNICE a.s.
4 23,821,998
MATEX HK s.r.o.
7 13,736,114
Other suppliers 39 78,350,079

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

76%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 456,802,170
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 327,151,730
Total 783,953,900

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 91%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 42% (28 from 66)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (1 from 66)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 66)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 66)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 66)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 66)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 66)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 66)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 66)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

81%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 63 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders