City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 5

IČO 00063631

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

17.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

12%
average 42%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
CENTRA a.s.
2 172,110,560
CDV služby, s.r.o.
2 172,110,560
Copymat s.r.o
1 49,000,000
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 33,968,479
Stavební společnost Jaroslav Oršuliak, a.s.
1 28,776,236
Other suppliers 20 218,466,915

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 55% (6 from 11)
Nonprice competition 27% (3 from 11)
Lots 0% (0 from 11)
E-auction 0% (0 from 11)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

39%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 18%
Cancelled contracts 36%
Average requirements modifications count 1.36

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 13% (4 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 7% (2 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)