Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Brandýs nad Labem - Stará Boleslav

IČO 00240079

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Auböck s.r.o.
2 119,309,937
STAVOKOMPLET spol. s r.o.
3 21,354,307
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
2 16,232,183
STARKON a.s.
1 9,480,486
Sdružení JIB s.r.o. a Jindřich Bursík
1 7,797,260
Other suppliers 14 46,510,352

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (4 from 14)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 14)
Lots 0% (0 from 14)
E-auction 0% (0 from 14)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

71%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 588,137,923
Unregulated purchases 585,451,344
Total 1,173,589,267

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 21%
Cancelled contracts 7%
Average requirements modifications count 1.21

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 31)
Final or estimated price not published 13% (4 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 31)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 31)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 10% (3 from 31)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 17% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.43 (average mistakes per contract)