City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 3

IČO 00063517

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rámcová dohoda na provádění stavebních prací (úpravy, opravy a rekonstrukce) na objektech a pozemcích městské části Praha 3"
Výstavba domů
5
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy panelových domů Praha 3, ul. Rokycanova 18, Sabinova 8 a 10, Českobratrská 7, 9 a 11
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
12
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy panelových domů Praha 3, ul. Jeseniova 15, 17, 19, 23 a 25
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
13
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Bořivojova 27
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy panelových domů Praha 3, ul. Jeseniova 37, 39 a 41, Ostromečská 3 a 5
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
19
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Podzimek a synové s.r.o.
2 234,483,684
Trigema Building a.s.
2 207,983,067
EDIKT a.s.
3 161,286,830
Auböck s.r.o.
1 160,000,000
Subterra a.s.
1 160,000,000
Other suppliers 41 480,944,599

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 41% (12 from 29)
Nonprice competition 3% (1 from 29)
Lots 14% (4 from 29)
E-auction 0% (0 from 29)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 1.48

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

47%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (4 from 55)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (6 from 55)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 55)
Missing supplier ID 4% (2 from 55)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 55)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 55)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 55)
Missing call for tenders 20% (11 from 55)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.29 (average mistakes per contract)