City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 3

IČO 00063517

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 42%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Podzimek a synové s.r.o.
2 234,483,684
Trigema Building a.s.
2 207,983,067
EDIKT a.s.
3 161,286,830
Auböck s.r.o.
1 160,000,000
Subterra a.s.
1 160,000,000
Other suppliers 41 480,944,599

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 52% (12 from 23)
Nonprice competition 3% (1 from 29)
Division into lots 14% (4 from 29)
E-auction 0% (0 from 29)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 29)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro Městskou část Praha 3“
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed
Rozšíření informačního centra Praha 3 o suterénní prostory - dodatečné stavební práce
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 1.48

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

47%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (4 from 55)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (6 from 55)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 55)
Missing supplier ID 4% (2 from 55)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 55)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 55)
Missing call for tenders 20% (11 from 55)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 55)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 55)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.29 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 51 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders