Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Tábor

IČO 00253014

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

2.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ZŠ a MŠ Tábor v Husově ulici – stavební práce
Stavební úpravy školních budov
7
Ø5 in industry
Obnova sportovně rekreačního areálu pod Stadionem Míru (bývalá Sokolská plovárna v Táboře) - II. etapa.
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Odstranění vad panelových domů ulice Havanská čp. 2808-2810, Tábor
Stavební úpravy domů
8
Ø4 in industry
Dokončení revitalizace zóny IPRM Tábor, 2015
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Odstranění vad panelových domů čp. 2811-2812, ulice Havanská, Tábor
Stavební úpravy domů
8
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HORA s.r.o.
4 38,623,792
DŘEVOTVAR - ŘEMESLA a STAVBY, s.r.o.
1 36,982,964
ACG-Real s.r.o.
4 28,163,176
E.ON Energie, a.s.
1 18,401,966
DAICH spol. s r. o.
1 17,900,021
Other suppliers 14 69,167,598

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

78%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 22% (5 from 23)
Nonprice competition 22% (5 from 23)
Lots 9% (2 from 23)
E-auction 9% (2 from 23)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 636,653,924
Unregulated purchases 2,011,679,154
Total 2,648,333,078

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.74

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (2 from 34)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (2 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 34)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 34)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.35 (average mistakes per contract)