Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Hradec Králové

IČO 00268810

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

24.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Obnova základní umělecké školy Střezina v areálu ZŠ a MŠ Jih Hradec Králové - STAVEBNÍ PRÁCE
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Okružní křižovatka U Koruny v Hradci Králové
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení
6
Ø7 in industry
Infocentrum Hradec Králové
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
9
Ø2 in industry
„Silnice III/29827 Malšova Lhota – Hradec Králové, I.etapa a Rekonstrukce chodníků a infrastruktury silnice III/29827 – I. etapa“
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø7 in industry
Poskytovatel telekomunikačních služeb pro Statutární město Hradec Králové
Telekomunikační služby
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PRIMA spol. s r.o.
1 154,455,623
SPOLEČNOST M – SILNICE a SOVIS, OK U Koruny HK
1 100,000,000
MATEX HK s.r.o.
6 54,557,970
M-SILNICE a.s.
1 26,775,734
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
2 22,455,026
Other suppliers 60 213,053,919

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 61% (28 from 46)
Nonprice competition 13% (6 from 46)
Lots 2% (1 from 46)
E-auction 2% (1 from 46)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,207,799,938
Unregulated purchases 1,268,621,687
Total 2,476,421,625

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 24%
Average requirements modifications count 0.85

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (6 from 87)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (3 from 87)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 87)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 87)
Missing buyer ID 1% (1 from 87)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 87)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 87)
Missing call for tenders 3% (3 from 87)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

63%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 81% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.72 (average mistakes per contract)