Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Hořovice

IČO 00233242

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Svoz a likvidace odpadu pro Město Hořovice
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
1
Ø2 in industry
Sportovní hala v Hořovicích
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace v ulici K nemocnici v Hořovicích
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
2
Ø7 in industry
"Stavební úpravy víceúčelového hřiště v Hořovicích"
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
4
Ø3 in industry
"Starý zámek Hořovice č.p. 30 - rekonstrukce prostor hospodářského křídla na knihovnu"
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
14
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 56,517,066
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
2 54,864,655
STRABAG a.s.
2 24,891,187
ENVOS s.r.o.
1 16,466,369
STAVEKO, spol. s r.o.
2 10,550,498
Other suppliers 6 13,953,358

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

79%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 241,499,912
Unregulated purchases 144,622,925
Total 386,122,837

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

82%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Hořovice
Previous tender without bids
6,672,490
"Starý zámek Hořovice č.p. 30 - rekonstrukce prostor hospodářského křídla na knihovnu - vícepráce"
Additional works
1,800,717

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (4 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

34%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 63% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.13 (average mistakes per contract)