Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Hlučín

IČO 00300063

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

24%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Novostavba tělocvičny Hlučín – Darkovičky
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
3
Ø5 in industry
Novostavba tělocvičny Hlučín – Bobrovníky
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
4
Ø5 in industry
Prostor před kulturním domem v Hlučíně vč. navazujících parkových ploch
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø7 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice Rovniny
Stavební úpravy chodníků
4
Ø6 in industry
Přístup ke hřbitovu „Na Březinách“ – Lávka
Zařízení pro lešení
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Skanska a.s.
2 25,015,386
OSTRAVSKÉ STAVBY a.s.
1 22,851,172
STRABAG a.s.
1 13,721,265
COMMODUM, spol. s r.o.
1 12,899,981
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 12,899,981
Other suppliers 10 34,659,991

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 162,710,267
Unregulated purchases 427,259,622
Total 589,969,889

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (3 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 7% (1 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 43% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.79 (average mistakes per contract)