Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Jihlava

IČO 00286010

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Podzimek a synové s.r.o.
8 59,369,795
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
2 56,470,272
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
4 46,070,218
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 44,533,333
MADOS MT s.r.o.
1 44,533,333
Other suppliers 75 210,442,131

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

86%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 21% (3 from 14)
Nonprice competition 13% (2 from 15)
Division into lots 20% (3 from 15)
E-auction 20% (3 from 15)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 15)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,147,256,067
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 2,305,403,017
Total 3,452,659,084

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

67%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Snížení znečištění ve vodních tocích ze stokové sítě města Jihlavy“, dodatek č. 2 k SOD
Additional works , Outside directive scope
- 7,997,174
„Snížení znečištění ve vodních tocích ze stokové sítě města Jihlavy“, dodatek č. 4 k SOD
Additional works , Outside directive scope
- 3,946,583
ZOO pěti kontinentů, Jihlava, dodatek č. 18 k SOD
Additional works , Outside directive scope
- 3,481,132
„Snížení znečištění ve vodních tocích ze stokové sítě města Jihlavy“, dodatek č. 8 k SOD
Additional works , Outside directive scope
- 3,127,863
ZOO pěti kontinentů, Jihlava, dodatek č. 21 k SOD
Additional works , Outside directive scope
- 2,717,164

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.73

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (1 from 79)
Final or estimated price not published 1% (1 from 79)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 79)
Missing supplier ID 1% (1 from 79)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 79)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 79)
Missing call for tenders 1% (1 from 79)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 79)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 79)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

14%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 38% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.97 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 76 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders