Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Nové Město na Moravě

IČO 00294900

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

14%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Adaptaceobjektu č.p.16 v NMNM pro potřeby ZUŠ-stavební část,dodávka interiéru- část 2) dodávka interiéru
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
2
Ø4 in industry
Komunitní dům seniorů Nové Město na Moravě
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Nové Město na Moravě-rekonstrukce komunikace, kanalizace a vodovodu ul. Drobného
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
12
Ø7 in industry
Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Novém Městě na Moravě na období 7/2018-12/2021
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
1
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Novém Městě na Moravě na období 2016-2018
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

50%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
STAREDO s.r.o.
3 53,236,094
ZDAR, a.s.
2 11,871,000
PKS stavby a.s.
5 8,604,128
E.ON Energie, a.s.
3 8,366,120
SPH stavby s.r.o.
1 6,942,168
Other suppliers 13 15,936,630

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 75% (3 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 271,811,956
Unregulated purchases 371,441,348
Total 643,253,304

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (2 from 25)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 25)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

100%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)