Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Krnov

IČO 00296139

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Průmyslová zóna Krnov – Červený dvůr II.etapa
Stavební práce
18
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce venkovního koupaliště v Krnově
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kanalizace Krnov - Chářovská
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Gorkého v Krnově
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Základní škola Smetanův okruh 4, Krnov – stavební úpravy tělocvičny a školního dvora – volnočasové aktivity
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
3 80,385,831
RAKORD - R & R, spol. s r.o.
1 32,151,380
Agist systems, s.r.o.
2 9,802,242
TERNO FIREK, s.r.o.
8 6,631,242
AF Stav Krnov s.r.o.
1 5,741,378
Other suppliers 9 21,489,436

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

45%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 245,201,339
Unregulated purchases 943,687,433
Total 1,188,888,772

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 80%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (2 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 28% (5 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 7% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.14 (average mistakes per contract)