Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Nový Bor

IČO 00260771

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Court found serious misconduct.

24.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce středu města Nový Bor – III. etapa
Construction work
4
Ø5 in industry
Sdružený nákup zemního plynu pro město Nový Bor na rok 2017 a 2018
Natural gas
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce povrchů chodníků a komunikace B. Egermanna Nový Bor

6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce středu města Nový Bor - II. etapa

4
Ø5 in industry


4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SaM silnice a mosty a.s.
3 30,588,179
DOKOM FINAL s.r.o.
1 23,140,416
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
1 21,719,061
ZEPS s.r.o.
2 16,097,055
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 7,777,777
Other suppliers 7 21,900,413

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

89%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Division into lots 20% (1 from 5)
E-auction 20% (1 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

73%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 308,674,915
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 270,699,895
Total 579,374,810

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Chodník Generála Svobody - Nový Bor
Additional works
- 5,170,255

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

95%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 33% (4 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

90%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.42 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders