Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Pohořelice

IČO 00283509

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

11.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
.A.S.A., spol. s r.o.
1 10,174,976
OSP, spol. s r.o.
2 9,875,923
Moravská stavební unie - MSU s.r.o.
2 7,072,466
VESTAV group s.r.o.
2 5,274,559
AQUA - GAS, s.r.o.
1 4,966,934
Other suppliers 10 19,022,061

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 152,983,726
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 294,310,701
Total 447,294,427

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce MŠ Pohořelice II - Dodatek č. 1 ke Smlouvě o dílo
Previous tender without bids , Additional works , Outside directive scope
- 505,134
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy kina, Komenského 1624, Pohořelice včetně výměny zdroje vytápění - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 423,133

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (2 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

47%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 76% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.18 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders