Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Třinec

IČO 00297313

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zlepšení systému protipovodňové ochrany města Třinec
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry
Údržba veřejné zeleně města Třinec II
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
2
Ø4 in industry
Údržba veřejné zeleně města Třinec I
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
2
Ø4 in industry
Chodník a lávka pro pěší přes silnici I/11 Nebory - Dušinec - nové vyhlášení
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
2
Ø5 in industry
„Nízkonákladové bydlení – sociální bydlení Nebory“
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
5 36,342,369
Společnost VYKRUT a UPG – Třinec II
2 34,787,809
MASTER IT Technologies, a.s.
2 18,832,046
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 18,621,932
Strojírny a stavby Třinec, a.s.
1 16,000,000
Other suppliers 30 90,538,487

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

59%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 14% (3 from 21)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 21)
Lots 0% (0 from 21)
E-auction 0% (0 from 21)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 413,929,887
Unregulated purchases 1,309,835,985
Total 1,723,765,872

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.62

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 47)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (3 from 47)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 47)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 47)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 47)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 47)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 47)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 47)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

56%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.72 (average mistakes per contract)