Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Jilemnice

IČO 00275808

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. The competition for contracts is high.

58.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Silnice II/293 Jilemnice, humanizace
Práce na stavbě silnic
7
Ø7 in industry
Všesportovní a volnočasový areál Hraběnka
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
5
Ø3 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech města Jilemnice
Energetické a související služby
4
Ø4 in industry
Všesportovní a volnočasový areál Hraběnka – II. a III. realizační celek
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
3
Ø3 in industry
Údržba místních komunikací ve městě Jilemnice v zimním období 2015 – 2019
Čistící a hygienické služby v městských a venkovských oblastech a související služby
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 43,370,827
Laušman a Malý s.r.o.
2 27,564,934
M-SILNICE a.s.
2 27,564,934
MVV Energie CZ a.s.
1 18,417,230
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 7,786,870
Other suppliers 2 4,636,662

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 173,566,781
Unregulated purchases 601,123,811
Total 774,690,592

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 11% (1 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 57% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.43 (average mistakes per contract)