Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Karviná

IČO 00297534

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

12.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
“REVITALIZACE VEŘEJNÉHO PROSTRANSTVÍ V CENTRU MĚSTA KARVINÉ”
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Komplexní pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti za újmu
Pojištění odpovědnosti za škodu
1
Ø2 in industry
OSVĚTLENÍ HRACÍ PLOCHY MĚSTSKÉHO STADIONU V KARVINÉ - RÁJI
Elektrické strojní zařízení, přístroje, zařízení a spotřební materiál, osvětlení
4
Ø2 in industry
„MODERNIZACE KOMUNIKACE UL. CIOLKOVSKÉHO"
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
“DEŠŤOVÁ KANALIZACE NA UL. LÁZEŇSKÉ V KARVINÉ - DARKOVĚ”
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
1 17,379,764
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
2 17,047,610
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 14,696,100
AWT Rekultivace a.s.
2 11,894,133
ELTODO, a.s.
1 11,545,758
Other suppliers 18 64,025,492

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

72%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (6 from 15)
Nonprice competition 7% (1 from 15)
Lots 20% (3 from 15)
E-auction 0% (0 from 15)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 597,483,654
Unregulated purchases 1,468,233,769
Total 2,065,717,423

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

64%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.93

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (3 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

84%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.45 (average mistakes per contract)