Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Pelhřimov

IČO 00248801

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

58.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Průmyslová zóna Skrýšov- etapa IV.
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
13
Ø7 in industry
PELHŘIMOV - REKONSTRUKCE INŽENÝRSKÝCH SÍTÍ V ULICI DOBIÁŠOVA
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø7 in industry
Pelhřimov , rekonstrukce inženýrských sítí v ul. Sdružená a Lesní
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
12
Ø7 in industry
ZTV Polní dvůr II - VI etapa
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
11
Ø7 in industry
Vestavba šaten pod západní tribunou zimního stadionu v Pelhřimově
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
E.ON Energie, a.s.
1 40,341,160
VHST s.r.o.
3 36,589,126
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 25,666,000
EVOS-HYDRO, s.r.o.
2 14,490,238
STRABAG a.s.
1 11,100,000
Other suppliers 10 54,884,509

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 516,784,750
Unregulated purchases 535,175,533
Total 1,051,960,283

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

57%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (8 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 5% (1 from 21)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 24% (5 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)