Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Neratovice

IČO 00237108

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Neratovice-Mlékojedy - splašková kanalizace a ČOV
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Na Výsluní č. p. 1234, Neratovice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ulice Masarykova Neratovice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce chodníků ulice Kojetická
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy č. p. 1034, Neratovice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BAK stavební společnost, a.s.
1 29,115,446
EMH stavební CZ s.r.o.
2 15,951,555
STAVEBNÍ FIRMA NEUMANN s.r.o.
2 10,868,303
STRABAG a.s.
1 8,540,000
MARBES CONSULTING s.r.o.
1 4,896,000
Other suppliers 4 10,942,567

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 176,928,360
Unregulated purchases 660,267,824
Total 837,196,185

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)

Additional works
897,897

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (2 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 31% (5 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 19% (3 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.36 (average mistakes per contract)