Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Domažlice

IČO 00253316

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

27.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

48%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 155,735,480
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 40,264,712
BIS, a.s.
1 25,588,656
E.ON Energie, a.s.
2 18,423,305
SANI-TOP-CENTRUM s.r.o.
1 17,203,245
Other suppliers 16 39,735,769

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

56%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 71% (12 from 17)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 17)
Division into lots 6% (1 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

97%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 450,541,292
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 30,041,564
Total 480,582,856

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Domažlice, Fügnerova č.p. 647 - Zateplení objektu sportovní haly
Previous tender without bids
- 6,317,387
Rekonstrukce MKS" (Městské kulturní středisko) Domažlice - stavební úpravy v 1.NP a 2.NP objektu - ETAPA č. 1
Previous tender without bids
- 4,327,191
Pojištění majetku, vozidel a odpovědnosti za škodu pro město Domažlice a příspěvkové organizace zřízené městem Domažlice a společnosti založené městem Domažlice
Previous tender without bids
- 797,055

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 59%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (4 from 32)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 32)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 32)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 32)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 32)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 32)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 32)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 32)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 32)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

98%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.08 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders