Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Kladno

IČO 00234516

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Court found serious misconduct.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření využitelnosti historické budovy Městského divadla Kladno

7
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace hřišť
Sports fields maintenance services
1
Ø5 in industry
Podzemní kontejnery - Kladno
Construction work
1
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba parkoviště v ul. V. Rabase, Kladno

3
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace prostoru podél třídy ČSA v Kladně
Construction work
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
S u b t e r r a a.s.
1 94,299,999
Gardenline s.r.o.
4 39,725,788
Vladislav Tesárek
1 32,000,000
AVE Kladno s.r.o.
1 28,971,905
ARTEA CZ, a.s.
2 24,556,389
Other suppliers 51 155,287,652

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 84% (21 from 25)
Nonprice competition 11% (4 from 35)
Division into lots 14% (5 from 35)
E-auction 11% (4 from 35)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 35)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 730,360,039
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 3,417,137,680
Total 4,147,497,719

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Mobilní telefonie Statutárního města Kladna a jeho organizací
Authorship rights
- 81,308

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.71

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (3 from 69)
Final or estimated price not published 35% (24 from 69)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 69)
Missing supplier ID 7% (5 from 69)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 69)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 69)
Missing call for tenders 4% (3 from 69)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 69)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 69)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

5%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 31% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.04 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 48 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders