Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Děčín

IČO 00261238

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 52%
Largest contracts
Nakládání s odpady
Refuse collection services
Ø2 in industry
Údržba komunikací
Repair, maintenance and associated services related to roads and other equipment
Ø2 in industry
Údržba zeleně
Grounds maintenance services
Ø5 in industry
Obnova historické části Podmokel - etapa C
Paths and other metalled surfaces
Ø5 in industry
Sběrný dvůr
Refuse collection services
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Marius Pedersen a.s.
6 397,189,627
4 59,393,305
Metrostav a.s.
2 35,247,412
Edenred CZ s.r.o.
1 27,804,336
SaM silnice a mosty Děčín a.s.
4 22,267,174
Other suppliers 33 128,546,523

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 832,683,546
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 777,464,474
Total 1,610,148,020

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce domova pro seniory Děčín II, Kamenická 755/195 JŘBU IV
Additional works
- 3,098,997
Údržba zeleně - uplatnění opce
Additional works
- 2,916,362
Revitalizace veřejného prostranství panelového sídliště Březiny-JŘBU
Additional works
- 2,354,295
Manažerský informační systém
Previous tender without bids
- 1,311,830
JŘBU-Zámek Děčín- revitalizace zázemí zámeckého areálu
Additional works
- 1,162,117

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 42)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (2 from 42)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 42)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 42)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 42)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 42)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 42)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 42)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 42)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.24 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 41 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders