Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Znojmo

IČO 00293881

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

27%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
II/408 Suchohrdly – Přímětice – I/38 (průtahy)
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Znojmo_Dodávky plynu na dva roky
Zemní plyn
3
Ø5 in industry
Veřejná zakázka o sdružených službách dodávky zemního plynu pro město Znojmo a městské organizace v roce 2016.
Zemní plyn
4
Ø5 in industry
Inženýrské sítě v areálu Pivovaru
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
6
Ø6 in industry
Znojmo – Revitalizace Dolního parku ve Znojmě – etapa C1, C3/1
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 40,248,675
Doprastav, a.s.
1 34,339,696
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 34,339,696
RWE Energie, s.r.o.
1 30,410,967
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 17,649,993
Other suppliers 12 65,251,142

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 71%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 361,629,004
Unregulated purchases 1,115,682,982
Total 1,477,311,986

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti města Znojma a příspěvkových organizací
Outside directive scope
5,250,488
Regenerace ulic MPR - Velká Michalská - dodatečné stavební práce č.2
Additional works
304,179

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

35%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.28 (average mistakes per contract)