Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Aš

IČO 00253901

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

1.
ranking
85%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektu LaRitma pro ZUŠ, Aš
Rekonstrukce budov
7
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace vnitrobloku Karlova a Moravská
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
10
Ø6 in industry
Komunitní centrum Kuželna Aš
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce chodníků ulic Šaldova a Janáčkova, Aš
Stavební úpravy chodníků
9
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce MK Gustava Geipela v Aši
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
RMC STAVBY s.r.o.
2 48,518,252
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 21,413,909
ALGON, a.s.
3 20,046,653
ODEHNAL - STAVO s.r.o.
2 9,958,894
BAUING KV s.r.o.
1 6,930,000
Other suppliers 8 26,389,508

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

91%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (4 from 6)
Nonprice competition 17% (1 from 6)
Lots 17% (1 from 6)
E-auction 50% (3 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 235,524,477
Unregulated purchases 579,433,004
Total 814,957,481

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (2 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 29% (5 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

83%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.69 (average mistakes per contract)