Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Bruntál

IČO 00295892

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

78.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Obnova a modernizace ČOV Bruntál - 3. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro továrny, důlní činnost, průmyslovou výrobu a budovy sloužící ropnému a plynárenskému průmyslu
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace stávající jednotné kanalizace na ul. V Aleji a ul. Smetanova v Bruntále
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø7 in industry
RPS - Bruntál, sídliště Květná - I. etapa
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
2
Ø5 in industry
Denní stacionář v Bruntále
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
2
Ø4 in industry
RPS – Bruntál, sídliště Květná – II. etapa
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KARETA s.r.o.
4 38,166,000
KRÁLOVOPOLSKÁ RIA, a.s.
1 30,500,000
JR STaKR s.r.o.
2 11,949,423
NOSTA, s.r.o.
1 10,635,000
One Energy & One Mobile a.s.
1 5,878,323
Other suppliers 5 12,913,763

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 300,059,408
Unregulated purchases 588,763,521
Total 888,822,929

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
RPS - Bruntál, sídliště Dolní – III. etapa - dokončení
Previous tender without bids
899,423

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (2 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

29%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.57 (average mistakes per contract)